The EU Taxonomy Regulation
The EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2020/852) is the cornerstone of the EU's sustainable finance framework. It establishes a unified classification system that defines which economic activities can be labelled as environmentally sustainable — providing a common language for companies, investors, and financial institutions to describe the sustainability of their business activities with clarity and comparability.
Before the EU Taxonomy existed, claims about "green" or "sustainable" business activities were largely unverified and inconsistent. A manufacturing company might call itself sustainable based on a carbon reduction initiative, while a real estate company used the same term based on energy-efficient buildings. The Taxonomy creates a single, technical standard against which all claims must be measured — backed by detailed Technical Screening Criteria developed by the European Commission's Platform on Sustainable Finance with expert input from scientists, industry, and civil society.
The Taxonomy is not a prohibition: it does not tell companies they cannot engage in non-taxonomy-aligned activities. Instead, it creates a disclosure obligation: companies in scope of CSRD (previously NFRD) must calculate and publicly report what percentage of their net turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx), and operating expenditure (OpEx) is taxonomy-aligned. This enables investors to compare the "green share" of different companies on a like-for-like basis.
The financial markets dimension is equally important. Financial market participants — banks, asset managers, insurance companies — must disclose the Taxonomy alignment of their financial products under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). A fund marketing itself as an Article 9 "sustainable investment" fund must quantify and disclose the Taxonomy alignment of its portfolio, creating significant downstream demand for Taxonomy disclosures from investee companies.
The EU Taxonomy covers six objectives
The Taxonomy assesses economic activities against six environmental objectives. An activity must substantially contribute to at least one objective without significantly harming any of the other five (the DNSH principle):
Climate Change Mitigation
Activities that substantially reduce or avoid GHG emissions, or enhance GHG removals. Currently the most developed objective.
Climate Change Adaptation
Activities that substantially reduce the adverse impact of climate change, including increased variability of climate, on the activity itself or on people, nature, and assets.
Sustainable Use of Water
Activities that substantially contribute to the sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources.
Circular Economy
Activities that substantially contribute to transitioning to a circular economy, including waste reduction, recycling, and extending product lifetimes.
Pollution Prevention
Activities that substantially contribute to prevention and control of pollution of air, water, or land, including reducing emissions of hazardous substances.
Biodiversity & Ecosystems
Activities that substantially contribute to the protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems, including sustainable agriculture and fisheries.
When is an activity taxonomy-aligned?
For an economic activity to be classified as taxonomy-aligned, it must simultaneously satisfy all three of the following conditions:
Substantial Contribution
The activity must substantially contribute to at least one of the six environmental objectives, as defined by the Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) in the relevant Delegated Act.
Do No Significant Harm
The activity must not significantly harm any of the other five environmental objectives. Separate DNSH criteria are specified for each objective in the Delegated Acts.
Minimum Social Safeguards
The activity must be carried out in compliance with minimum social safeguards — specifically, the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Terms you need to know
Taxonomy-Eligible vs. Taxonomy-Aligned
Eligibility means an activity is in principle covered by the Taxonomy (it appears in the Delegated Acts). Alignment means the activity actually meets all the TSC, DNSH, and social safeguard conditions. Both must be reported separately.
Technical Screening Criteria (TSC)
Specific, quantitative criteria for each activity defining what "substantial contribution" and "do no significant harm" mean in practice. TSC are set out in Delegated Regulations and are reviewed periodically.
The Three KPIs
Companies must report three financial KPIs: the share of taxonomy-aligned/eligible net turnover, CapEx (capital expenditure), and OpEx (operational expenditure). Each KPI must be reported as both eligible and aligned percentages.
Delegated Acts
The TSC are set out in Delegated Regulations adopted by the Commission. The Climate Delegated Act (2021) covers climate objectives 1 and 2. The Environmental Delegated Act (2023) covers objectives 3–6. Further updates are expected.
Enabling and Transitional Activities
The Taxonomy recognises two special categories: "transitional activities" (activities with no low-carbon alternative but on a transition trajectory, e.g. natural gas in specific contexts) and "enabling activities" (activities that enable others to be sustainable, e.g. manufacturing wind turbine components).
DNSH Principle
Do No Significant Harm — the condition that an activity, while substantially contributing to one objective, must not cause significant harm to the other five. DNSH tests vary by activity and are often the most technically complex part of Taxonomy assessment.
Who must report and what
- Large companies subject to CSRD/NFRD must disclose three KPIs: turnover %, CapEx %, and OpEx % that are taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned, broken down by environmental objective, in their annual sustainability report.
- Financial market participants under SFDR must disclose the Taxonomy alignment of their financial products — Article 9 products must set minimum Taxonomy alignment targets and report actual alignment annually.
- All in-scope companies must first report taxonomy-eligibility (which activities appear in the Delegated Acts) before progressing to taxonomy-alignment (which activities actually meet the TSC and DNSH conditions).
- CapEx plans must be described for activities that are not yet aligned but are on a credible transition trajectory toward alignment — allowing companies to demonstrate forward-looking investment in taxonomy-aligned activities.
- Assurance is required as part of CSRD reporting — Taxonomy KPIs are included in the sustainability report subject to independent limited assurance from the company's auditor or assurance provider.
TSC examples, KPI methodology, Delegated Acts, sector deep-dives & compliance checklist
The technical guidance your team needs to calculate and disclose correctly.